Fwd: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption

Guillaume Nodet
Administrator
FYI


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joe Schaefer <[hidden email]>
Date: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 14:28
Subject: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption
To: Apache Infrastructure <[hidden email]>


While many of you are aware of the ongoing "experiment/alpha test"
with git hosting for CouchDB, you may not be aware of the recent
members@ discussion about git @ Apache, the result of which is to
solicit proposals here for projects interested in adopting git now,
rather than after the testing phase is over.

Any such projects you participate in should write a brief and civil
proposal as to why we should select you for further git testing.
Proposals should include statements of interest in assisting with
the git hosting codebase and associated jira issues from named
individuals on the project.

We'll allow the remainder of the week to collect proposals before
deciding on who gets to go next.




--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption

Christian Mueller
Hello!

Guillaume, thanks for sharing this info with us.
I know many/most of the Camel committers use Git over SVN. This means this
could be interesting for us. I'm wondering what will happen after the
testing phase, if we have a negative outcome for Git? Or will we have a
positive outcome in each case and this testing phase is more or less to set
up the infrastructure at Apache?
Do we have significant advantages by using Git directly (not over SVN)?

Best,
Christian

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[hidden email]> wrote:

> FYI
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Joe Schaefer <[hidden email]>
> Date: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 14:28
> Subject: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption
> To: Apache Infrastructure <[hidden email]>
>
>
> While many of you are aware of the ongoing "experiment/alpha test"
> with git hosting for CouchDB, you may not be aware of the recent
> members@ discussion about git @ Apache, the result of which is to
> solicit proposals here for projects interested in adopting git now,
> rather than after the testing phase is over.
>
> Any such projects you participate in should write a brief and civil
> proposal as to why we should select you for further git testing.
> Proposals should include statements of interest in assisting with
> the git hosting codebase and associated jira issues from named
> individuals on the project.
>
> We'll allow the remainder of the week to collect proposals before
> deciding on who gets to go next.
>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Christian,

I'm using Git over SVN. The impact is not so high (but we have to update
the POM around the scm entries, release tag, etc).

Here is some interesting blog:
http://markmcb.com/2008/10/18/3-reasons-to-switch-to-git-from-subversion/
http://dev-heaven.net/projects/20/wiki/Git_vs_SVN_comparison
http://thinkvitamin.com/code/why-you-should-switch-from-subversion-to-git/
http://serverfault.com/questions/62603/git-vs-subversion-pros-and-cons

Regards
JB

On 12/02/2011 06:49 PM, Christian Müller wrote:

> Hello!
>
> Guillaume, thanks for sharing this info with us.
> I know many/most of the Camel committers use Git over SVN. This means this
> could be interesting for us. I'm wondering what will happen after the
> testing phase, if we have a negative outcome for Git? Or will we have a
> positive outcome in each case and this testing phase is more or less to set
> up the infrastructure at Apache?
> Do we have significant advantages by using Git directly (not over SVN)?
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>
>> FYI
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Joe Schaefer<[hidden email]>
>> Date: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 14:28
>> Subject: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption
>> To: Apache Infrastructure<[hidden email]>
>>
>>
>> While many of you are aware of the ongoing "experiment/alpha test"
>> with git hosting for CouchDB, you may not be aware of the recent
>> members@ discussion about git @ Apache, the result of which is to
>> solicit proposals here for projects interested in adopting git now,
>> rather than after the testing phase is over.
>>
>> Any such projects you participate in should write a brief and civil
>> proposal as to why we should select you for further git testing.
>> Proposals should include statements of interest in assisting with
>> the git hosting codebase and associated jira issues from named
>> individuals on the project.
>>
>> We'll allow the remainder of the week to collect proposals before
>> deciding on who gets to go next.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption

Christian Mueller
Thanks JB for the link!

I cannot see any advantages to early adopt Git as long we can use git-svn
on Apache. Did I miss or misunderstood anything?

Best,
Christian