Quantcast

[PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
33 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

[PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi all,

Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.

WDYT ?

If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.

Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Charles Moulliard
Hi Jean-Baptiste,

I agree on what you suggest and propose that after 4.5 we have a reflection
about what will be the future of ServiceMix 5.0. They are still a lot of
questions pending like adding a transversal bus for Camel communications
between bundles, add a Camel Global Context to also facilitate camel
exchanges using endpoints registered globally (and in this case using OSGI
Service), develop a monitoring console for CXF, Camel and ActiveMQ to be
able to collect metrics using jmxtrans (http://code.google.com/p/jmxtrans/)
project with graphite (http://graphite.wikidot.com/) or jolokia (
http://www.jolokia.org/), ...

Regards,

Charles Moulliard

Apache Committer

Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
Skype: cmoulliard


On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make
> a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com
Email: [hidden email]
Twitter : @cmoulliard, @fusenews
Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Charles,

+1 to spin "again" the ServiceMix 5 discussion ;)

My proposal is more to keep moving forward on ServiceMix and provide an
updated release ;)

Thanks for your quick feedback !
Regards
JB

On 05/07/2012 09:51 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:

> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>
> I agree on what you suggest and propose that after 4.5 we have a reflection
> about what will be the future of ServiceMix 5.0. They are still a lot of
> questions pending like adding a transversal bus for Camel communications
> between bundles, add a Camel Global Context to also facilitate camel
> exchanges using endpoints registered globally (and in this case using OSGI
> Service), develop a monitoring console for CXF, Camel and ActiveMQ to be
> able to collect metrics using jmxtrans (http://code.google.com/p/jmxtrans/)
> project with graphite (http://graphite.wikidot.com/) or jolokia (
> http://www.jolokia.org/), ...
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles Moulliard
>
> Apache Committer
>
> Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
> Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
> Skype: cmoulliard
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make
>> a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [hidden email]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Gert Vanthienen
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Jean-Baptiste,

Yeah, that definitely makes sense for me - there also was an ActiveMQ 5.6.0
release candidate vote this week, so perhaps we can add that one to the
'Mix as well.  I should have some cycles available next week to help out
too.

Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/


On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make
> a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Charles Moulliard
Of course ActiveMQ 5.6 should be integrated and specifically as it supports
Eclipse Jetty 7.5, WebSocket, ...

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Gert Vanthienen
<[hidden email]>wrote:

> Jean-Baptiste,
>
> Yeah, that definitely makes sense for me - there also was an ActiveMQ 5.6.0
> release candidate vote this week, so perhaps we can add that one to the
> 'Mix as well.  I should have some cycles available next week to help out
> too.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
> make
> > a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
> >
> > WDYT ?
> >
> > If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
> > off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > [hidden email]
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>
Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com
Email: [hidden email]
Twitter : @cmoulliard, @fusenews
Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
In reply to this post by Gert Vanthienen
It makes sense. I will start as soon as ActiveMQ 5.6.0 artifacts are
available on Central.

I'm starting the others updates to check if all is OK in the mean time.

Regards
JB

On 05/07/2012 11:14 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:

> Jean-Baptiste,
>
> Yeah, that definitely makes sense for me - there also was an ActiveMQ 5.6.0
> release candidate vote this week, so perhaps we can add that one to the
> 'Mix as well.  I should have some cycles available next week to help out
> too.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make
>> a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [hidden email]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

iocanel
Awesome! +1

--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*
Ioannis Canellos
http://iocanel.blogspot.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Daniel Kulp
In reply to this post by Jean-Baptiste Onofré
On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.

I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0.   Much better OSGi support there.

Dan

 
> WDYT ?
>
> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.


>
> Regards
> JB
--
Daniel Kulp
[hidden email]
http://dankulp.com/blog

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.

Especially in Camel 2.9.2:

<repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>

So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.

Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target versions.

Regards
JB

On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:

> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>
> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0.   Much better OSGi support there.
>
> Dan
>
>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> JB

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Claus Ibsen-2
Hi

Why not wait for Camel 2.10?
We will most likely get that out within a month or so.

Then you can use Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, and AMQ 5.6.0 as well.


If you are eager to cut a SMX release why not a 4.4.2, with CXF +
Camel upgrades in their patch releases.


On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
>
> Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
>
> <repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
>
> So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
>
> Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target versions.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>
>>
>> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0.   Much better OSGi support there.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com



--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Email: [hidden email]
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Johan Edstrom-3
+1.

On May 7, 2012, at 7:58 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:

> Hi
>
> Why not wait for Camel 2.10?
> We will most likely get that out within a month or so.
>
> Then you can use Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, and AMQ 5.6.0 as well.
>
>
> If you are eager to cut a SMX release why not a 4.4.2, with CXF +
> Camel upgrades in their patch releases.
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
>>
>> Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
>>
>> <repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
>>
>> So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
>>
>> Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target versions.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0.   Much better OSGi support there.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [hidden email]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
> FuseSource
> Email: [hidden email]
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
In reply to this post by Claus Ibsen-2
My idea is to do both aka:

- make a ServiceMix maintenance release (why not 4.4.1 with Camel 2.9.2,
Karaf 2.2.7, ActiveMQ 5.6.0, etc upgrade)
- make ServiceMix 4.5 including Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6, ActiveMQ 5.6.0,
Karaf 2.2.7

WDYT ?

Regards
JB

On 05/07/2012 03:58 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:

> Hi
>
> Why not wait for Camel 2.10?
> We will most likely get that out within a month or so.
>
> Then you can use Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, and AMQ 5.6.0 as well.
>
>
> If you are eager to cut a SMX release why not a 4.4.2, with CXF +
> Camel upgrades in their patch releases.
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
>>
>> Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
>>
>> <repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
>>
>> So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
>>
>> Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target versions.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0.   Much better OSGi support there.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [hidden email]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Claus Ibsen-2
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote:
> My idea is to do both aka:
>
> - make a ServiceMix maintenance release (why not 4.4.1 with Camel 2.9.2,
> Karaf 2.2.7, ActiveMQ 5.6.0, etc upgrade)

I would avoid upgrading AMQ from 5.5.1 to 5.6 in a patch release.
The AMQ 5.6.0 release is *big*, its 1 full year of development and
400+ jira tickets.


> - make ServiceMix 4.5 including Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6, ActiveMQ 5.6.0, Karaf
> 2.2.7

Yes makes sense to only do the AMQ 5.6 upgrade in SMX 4.5.

>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 05/07/2012 03:58 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Why not wait for Camel 2.10?
>> We will most likely get that out within a month or so.
>>
>> Then you can use Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, and AMQ 5.6.0 as well.
>>
>>
>> If you are eager to cut a SMX release why not a 4.4.2, with CXF +
>> Camel upgrades in their patch releases.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
>>>
>>> Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
>>>
>>>
>>> <repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
>>>
>>> So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
>>>
>>> Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target
>>> versions.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0.   Much better OSGi support there.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>
>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com



--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Email: [hidden email]
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
It makes sense Claus.

Regards
JB

On 05/07/2012 04:30 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:

> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> My idea is to do both aka:
>>
>> - make a ServiceMix maintenance release (why not 4.4.1 with Camel 2.9.2,
>> Karaf 2.2.7, ActiveMQ 5.6.0, etc upgrade)
>
> I would avoid upgrading AMQ from 5.5.1 to 5.6 in a patch release.
> The AMQ 5.6.0 release is *big*, its 1 full year of development and
> 400+ jira tickets.
>
>
>> - make ServiceMix 4.5 including Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6, ActiveMQ 5.6.0, Karaf
>> 2.2.7
>
> Yes makes sense to only do the AMQ 5.6 upgrade in SMX 4.5.
>
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 03:58 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Why not wait for Camel 2.10?
>>> We will most likely get that out within a month or so.
>>>
>>> Then you can use Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, and AMQ 5.6.0 as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> If you are eager to cut a SMX release why not a 4.4.2, with CXF +
>>> Camel upgrades in their patch releases.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>
>>>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
>>>>
>>>> Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
>>>>
>>>> So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
>>>>
>>>> Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target
>>>> versions.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0.   Much better OSGi support there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [hidden email]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Claus Ibsen-2
In reply to this post by Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi

BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
2.10 release.

So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.

BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.

As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.



On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make a
> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com



--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Email: [hidden email]
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks Claus,

Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.

Regards
JB

On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:

> Hi
>
> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
> 2.10 release.
>
> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>
> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>
> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make a
>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [hidden email]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys,

just to summarise the proposal:

1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
ActiveMQ 5.5.1
2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
(probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6

Is it ok for you all ?

Thanks
Regards
JB

On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

> Thanks Claus,
>
> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>> 2.10 release.
>>
>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>
>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>
>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>> make a
>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>> cut
>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Claus Ibsen-2
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> just to summarise the proposal:
>
> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to new
> Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of dependencies
> version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2, ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x (probably
> Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>
> Is it ok for you all ?
>

+1

Can you release the osgi bundles as well.
There is a pending apache-qpid bundle I am waiting for that would
allow Camel to easier work with AMQP.




> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Claus,
>>
>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>> 2.10 release.
>>>
>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>
>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>
>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>> make a
>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>> cut
>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com



--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Email: [hidden email]
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Yup, I will do that today (it was on my TODO).

Regards
JB

On 05/09/2012 08:40 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:

> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>
>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to new
>> Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of dependencies
>> version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2, ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x (probably
>> Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>
>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>
>
> +1
>
> Can you release the osgi bundles as well.
> There is a pending apache-qpid bundle I am waiting for that would
> allow Camel to easier work with AMQP.
>
>
>
>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>
>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>
>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>
>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>
>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>> make a
>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>
>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>> cut
>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [hidden email]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?

Gert Vanthienen
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Jean-Baptiste,


We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to now,
the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.

How about we do this instead?
- a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
- a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
- a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ 5.6.0

The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
everything works fine.  In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release set
from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a bit
more work).  Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also want
to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as well
- wdyt?


Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/


On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> just to summarise the proposal:
>
> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>
> Is it ok for you all ?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> Thanks Claus,
>>
>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>> 2.10 release.
>>>
>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>
>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>
>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>> make a
>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>> cut
>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
12
Loading...