[jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
19 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

JIRA jira@apache.org
Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
                 Key: SM-2328
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
             Project: ServiceMix
          Issue Type: Task
          Components: assemblies
            Reporter: Benjamin Graf






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

ksobkowiak
Hi

I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
(https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
containing following changes

  * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
  * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
  * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)

Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
new issues introduced with 2.10.0.

Best regards
Krzysztof


On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:

> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
> ---------------------------------
>
>              Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>                  Key: SM-2328
>                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>              Project: ServiceMix
>           Issue Type: Task
>           Components: assemblies
>             Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> (v6.2#6252)


--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Krzysztof

I will take a look tomorrow morning and test it.

Thanks,
Regards
JB

On 06/12/2014 09:33 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
> containing following changes
>
>    * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>    * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>    * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>      <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>
> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>> ---------------------------------
>>
>>               Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>                   Key: SM-2328
>>                   URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>               Project: ServiceMix
>>            Issue Type: Task
>>            Components: assemblies
>>              Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>> (v6.2#6252)
>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

Raúl Kripalani
In reply to this post by ksobkowiak
2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?

Raúl.

Sent from my iPad

> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
> containing following changes
>
>  * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>  * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>  * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>
> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>> ---------------------------------
>>
>>             Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>                 Key: SM-2328
>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>             Project: ServiceMix
>>          Issue Type: Task
>>          Components: assemblies
>>            Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>> (v6.2#6252)
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
> Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

ksobkowiak
Yes :-)

On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:

> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
>
> Raúl.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>> containing following changes
>>
>>  * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>>  * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>  * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>
>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>> ---------------------------------
>>>
>>>             Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>                 Key: SM-2328
>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>             Project: ServiceMix
>>>          Issue Type: Task
>>>          Components: assemblies
>>>            Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>
>> --
>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>
>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
>> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
>> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>> Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC

--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

Gert Vanthienen
Administrator
L.S.,


I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things
do look a lot better there.  How about we just commit those to the
servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to test
and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new
5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ upgrade
to 5.10.0 on Monday?  Similarly, I think I would do the same changes
on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well.
Wdyt?


Regards,

Gert Vanthienen


On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yes :-)
>
> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
>>
>> Raúl.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>> containing following changes
>>>
>>>  * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>>>  * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>  * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>
>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>             Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>                 Key: SM-2328
>>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>             Project: ServiceMix
>>>>          Issue Type: Task
>>>>          Components: assemblies
>>>>            Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>
>>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
>>> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
>>> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
>>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>>> Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
> Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
In reply to this post by ksobkowiak
Hi Krzysztof

I just tested and it looks better, thanks.

+1 to commit/push.

Regards
JB

On 06/12/2014 09:33 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
> containing following changes
>
>    * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>    * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>    * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>      <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>
> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>> ---------------------------------
>>
>>               Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>                   Key: SM-2328
>>                   URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>               Project: ServiceMix
>>            Issue Type: Task
>>            Components: assemblies
>>              Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>> (v6.2#6252)
>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

ksobkowiak
I'll push it in the evening.


On 13.06.2014 13:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

> Hi Krzysztof
>
> I just tested and it looks better, thanks.
>
> +1 to commit/push.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 06/12/2014 09:33 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>> containing following changes
>>
>>    * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>>    * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>    * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>      <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>
>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>> ---------------------------------
>>>
>>>               Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>                   Key: SM-2328
>>>                   URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>               Project: ServiceMix
>>>            Issue Type: Task
>>>            Components: assemblies
>>>              Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>
>>
>


--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

ksobkowiak
In reply to this post by Gert Vanthienen
Hi Gert

Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only change
should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4?

Best regards
Krzysztof

On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote:

> L.S.,
>
>
> I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things
> do look a lot better there.  How about we just commit those to the
> servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to test
> and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new
> 5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ upgrade
> to 5.10.0 on Monday?  Similarly, I think I would do the same changes
> on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well.
> Wdyt?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Yes :-)
>>
>> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
>>>
>>> Raúl.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>>> containing following changes
>>>>
>>>>  * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>>>>  * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>>  * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>>
>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>             Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>>                 Key: SM-2328
>>>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>>             Project: ServiceMix
>>>>>          Issue Type: Task
>>>>>          Components: assemblies
>>>>>            Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>> --
>>>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>>
>>>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>>>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
>>>> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
>>>> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
>>>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>>>> Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
>> --
>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>
>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
>> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
>> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>> Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC


--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
In reply to this post by ksobkowiak
Do you want that I do it ?

Let me know what you prefer.

Regards
JB

On 06/13/2014 01:38 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:

> I'll push it in the evening.
>
>
> On 13.06.2014 13:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof
>>
>> I just tested and it looks better, thanks.
>>
>> +1 to commit/push.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 06/12/2014 09:33 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>> containing following changes
>>>
>>>     * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>>>     * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>     * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>       <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>
>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>                Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>                    Key: SM-2328
>>>>                    URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>                Project: ServiceMix
>>>>             Issue Type: Task
>>>>             Components: assemblies
>>>>               Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
In reply to this post by ksobkowiak
I would do it for 5.0.x as well.

Regards
JB

On 06/13/2014 01:40 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:

> Hi Gert
>
> Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only change
> should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4?
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
>
> On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>> L.S.,
>>
>>
>> I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things
>> do look a lot better there.  How about we just commit those to the
>> servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to test
>> and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new
>> 5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ upgrade
>> to 5.10.0 on Monday?  Similarly, I think I would do the same changes
>> on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well.
>> Wdyt?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Yes :-)
>>>
>>> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>>>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
>>>>
>>>> Raúl.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>>>> containing following changes
>>>>>
>>>>>   * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>>>>>   * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>>>   * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>>>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>>>
>>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
>>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>>>                  Key: SM-2328
>>>>>>                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>>>              Project: ServiceMix
>>>>>>           Issue Type: Task
>>>>>>           Components: assemblies
>>>>>>             Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>>> --
>>>>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>>>
>>>>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>>>>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
>>>>> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
>>>>> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
>>>>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>>>>> Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
>>> --
>>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>
>>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
>>> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
>>> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
>>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>>> Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

ksobkowiak
In reply to this post by Jean-Baptiste Onofré
The problem occurs in master too. We could upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
(as it seem not to introduce new problems) and wait for next Karaf
version fixing the deploy issue. I haven't tested it with Karaf 3.0.0,
but I think we can simple wait for new Karaf as we can release 6.0.0 later.

On 13.06.2014 13:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

> Hi Krzysztof
>
> I just tested and it looks better, thanks.
>
> +1 to commit/push.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 06/12/2014 09:33 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>> containing following changes
>>
>>    * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>>    * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>    * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>      <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>
>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>> ---------------------------------
>>>
>>>               Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>                   Key: SM-2328
>>>                   URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>               Project: ServiceMix
>>>            Issue Type: Task
>>>            Components: assemblies
>>>              Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>
>>
>


--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

ksobkowiak
In reply to this post by Jean-Baptiste Onofré
If you have already everything on your drive and you manage to do it
with some commands and you have time  you can simply do this :-) . I'll
have access to my notebook in the evening.

On 13.06.2014 13:41, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

> Do you want that I do it ?
>
> Let me know what you prefer.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 06/13/2014 01:38 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>> I'll push it in the evening.
>>
>>
>> On 13.06.2014 13:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof
>>>
>>> I just tested and it looks better, thanks.
>>>
>>> +1 to commit/push.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 06/12/2014 09:33 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>>> containing following changes
>>>>
>>>>     * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with
>>>> 2.3.5)
>>>>     * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>>     * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>>       <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>>
>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find
>>>> eventual
>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>                Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>>                    Key: SM-2328
>>>>>                    URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>>                Project: ServiceMix
>>>>>             Issue Type: Task
>>>>>             Components: assemblies
>>>>>               Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

Gert Vanthienen
Administrator
In reply to this post by ksobkowiak
Hi Krzysztof,

I would give that a go, at least.  It looks like ActiveMQ 5.10.0 was
built with Camel 2.13.1, but the features files are pointing to a
version range of [2.12,3) for Camel, so it should work fine.  For
something like Camel, where people are actually using the API/classes
themselves, upgrading to a new minor version in a bugfix release would
not work, but for ActiveMQ, people are mostly using this as a service
provided by the platform so that should be a bit less of a concern.
So yeah, I would do the ActiveMQ upgrade for 5.0.x as well.

Regards,

Gert Vanthienen


On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Gert
>
> Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only change
> should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4?
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
>
> On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>> L.S.,
>>
>>
>> I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things
>> do look a lot better there.  How about we just commit those to the
>> servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to test
>> and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new
>> 5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ upgrade
>> to 5.10.0 on Monday?  Similarly, I think I would do the same changes
>> on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well.
>> Wdyt?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Yes :-)
>>>
>>> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>>>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
>>>>
>>>> Raúl.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>>>> containing following changes
>>>>>
>>>>>  * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>>>>>  * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>>>  * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>>>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>>>
>>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
>>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>>>                 Key: SM-2328
>>>>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>>>             Project: ServiceMix
>>>>>>          Issue Type: Task
>>>>>>          Components: assemblies
>>>>>>            Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>>> --
>>>>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>>>
>>>>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>>>>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
>>>>> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
>>>>> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
>>>>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>>>>> Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
>>> --
>>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>
>>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
>>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
>>> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
>>> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
>>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>>> Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
> e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
> Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

ksobkowiak
One remark for upgrading 5.0.x. The activemq-camel in the new ActiveMQ
version (since 5.9.1) is no more merged with activemq-osgi ueberbundle.
Thus some additional changes in the ServiceMix ActiveMQ modules and
features have to be performed (look at the changes in activemq and
assembly modules in
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/?p=servicemix.git;a=commit;h=f6f10bf715621e056bdc691cfc705697b1907862)

On 13.06.2014 13:51, Gert Vanthienen wrote:

> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> I would give that a go, at least.  It looks like ActiveMQ 5.10.0 was
> built with Camel 2.13.1, but the features files are pointing to a
> version range of [2.12,3) for Camel, so it should work fine.  For
> something like Camel, where people are actually using the API/classes
> themselves, upgrading to a new minor version in a bugfix release would
> not work, but for ActiveMQ, people are mostly using this as a service
> provided by the platform so that should be a bit less of a concern.
> So yeah, I would do the ActiveMQ upgrade for 5.0.x as well.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi Gert
>>
>> Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only change
>> should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>> On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>> L.S.,
>>>
>>>
>>> I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things
>>> do look a lot better there.  How about we just commit those to the
>>> servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to test
>>> and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new
>>> 5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ upgrade
>>> to 5.10.0 on Monday?  Similarly, I think I would do the same changes
>>> on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well.
>>> Wdyt?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Yes :-)
>>>>
>>>> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>>>>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Raúl.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>>>>> containing following changes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>>>>>>  * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>>>>  * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>>>>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
>>>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>             Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>>>>                 Key: SM-2328
>>>>>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>>>>             Project: ServiceMix
>>>>>>>          Issue Type: Task
>>>>>>>          Components: assemblies
>>>>>>>            Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>>>>>

--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Good point.

To limit the change on a minor release, I would just downgrade to Karaf
2.3.4 in SMX 5.0.x and keep ActiveMQ current version.
We will focus on the 5.10 upgrade in SMX 5.1.x.

My $0.01.

Regards
JB

On 06/13/2014 02:53 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:

> One remark for upgrading 5.0.x. The activemq-camel in the new ActiveMQ
> version (since 5.9.1) is no more merged with activemq-osgi ueberbundle.
> Thus some additional changes in the ServiceMix ActiveMQ modules and
> features have to be performed (look at the changes in activemq and
> assembly modules in
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/?p=servicemix.git;a=commit;h=f6f10bf715621e056bdc691cfc705697b1907862)
>
> On 13.06.2014 13:51, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> I would give that a go, at least.  It looks like ActiveMQ 5.10.0 was
>> built with Camel 2.13.1, but the features files are pointing to a
>> version range of [2.12,3) for Camel, so it should work fine.  For
>> something like Camel, where people are actually using the API/classes
>> themselves, upgrading to a new minor version in a bugfix release would
>> not work, but for ActiveMQ, people are mostly using this as a service
>> provided by the platform so that should be a bit less of a concern.
>> So yeah, I would do the ActiveMQ upgrade for 5.0.x as well.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Hi Gert
>>>
>>> Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only change
>>> should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>> L.S.,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things
>>>> do look a lot better there.  How about we just commit those to the
>>>> servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to test
>>>> and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new
>>>> 5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ upgrade
>>>> to 5.10.0 on Monday?  Similarly, I think I would do the same changes
>>>> on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well.
>>>> Wdyt?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> Yes :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>>>>>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Raúl.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>>>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>>>>>> containing following changes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced with 2.3.5)
>>>>>>>   * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>>>>>   * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>>>>>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find eventual
>>>>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>              Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>>>>>                  Key: SM-2328
>>>>>>>>                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>>>>>              Project: ServiceMix
>>>>>>>>           Issue Type: Task
>>>>>>>>           Components: assemblies
>>>>>>>>             Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>>>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>>>>>>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

ksobkowiak
Could you create a version 5.0.3 in Jira? I think, we have to reopen
some issues which have been solved by upgrade to Karaf 2.3.5 and will be
no more fixed after downgrade to 2.3.4 (like the Envers problem). We can
set the fix version to 5.1.1 and 5.0.3 which will be upgraded to Karaf
2.3.6 and the issues should be fixed again.

On 13.06.2014 14:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

> Good point.
>
> To limit the change on a minor release, I would just downgrade to
> Karaf 2.3.4 in SMX 5.0.x and keep ActiveMQ current version.
> We will focus on the 5.10 upgrade in SMX 5.1.x.
>
> My $0.01.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 06/13/2014 02:53 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>> One remark for upgrading 5.0.x. The activemq-camel in the new ActiveMQ
>> version (since 5.9.1) is no more merged with activemq-osgi ueberbundle.
>> Thus some additional changes in the ServiceMix ActiveMQ modules and
>> features have to be performed (look at the changes in activemq and
>> assembly modules in
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/?p=servicemix.git;a=commit;h=f6f10bf715621e056bdc691cfc705697b1907862)
>>
>>
>> On 13.06.2014 13:51, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> I would give that a go, at least.  It looks like ActiveMQ 5.10.0 was
>>> built with Camel 2.13.1, but the features files are pointing to a
>>> version range of [2.12,3) for Camel, so it should work fine.  For
>>> something like Camel, where people are actually using the API/classes
>>> themselves, upgrading to a new minor version in a bugfix release would
>>> not work, but for ActiveMQ, people are mostly using this as a service
>>> provided by the platform so that should be a bit less of a concern.
>>> So yeah, I would do the ActiveMQ upgrade for 5.0.x as well.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Gert
>>>>
>>>> Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only
>>>> change
>>>> should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>> On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>> L.S.,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things
>>>>> do look a lot better there.  How about we just commit those to the
>>>>> servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to
>>>>> test
>>>>> and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new
>>>>> 5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ
>>>>> upgrade
>>>>> to 5.10.0 on Monday?  Similarly, I think I would do the same changes
>>>>> on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well.
>>>>> Wdyt?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>> Yes :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>>>>>>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Raúl.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>>>>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>>>>>>> containing following changes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced
>>>>>>>> with 2.3.5)
>>>>>>>>   * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>>>>>>   * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>>>>>>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find
>>>>>>>> eventual
>>>>>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>              Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>>>>>>                  Key: SM-2328
>>>>>>>>>                  URL:
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>>>>>>              Project: ServiceMix
>>>>>>>>>           Issue Type: Task
>>>>>>>>>           Components: assemblies
>>>>>>>>>             Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>>>>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>>>>>>>
>>
>


--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

ksobkowiak
In reply to this post by Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi

I have downgraded servicemix-5.1.x and servicemix-5.0.x to Karaf 2.3.4
and upgraded master and servicemix-5.1.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0. I have
reopened some issue which, I think, will be no more fixed after the
downgrade. We should check them again

Best regards
Krzysztof


On 13.06.2014 14:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

> Good point.
>
> To limit the change on a minor release, I would just downgrade to
> Karaf 2.3.4 in SMX 5.0.x and keep ActiveMQ current version.
> We will focus on the 5.10 upgrade in SMX 5.1.x.
>
> My $0.01.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 06/13/2014 02:53 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>> One remark for upgrading 5.0.x. The activemq-camel in the new ActiveMQ
>> version (since 5.9.1) is no more merged with activemq-osgi ueberbundle.
>> Thus some additional changes in the ServiceMix ActiveMQ modules and
>> features have to be performed (look at the changes in activemq and
>> assembly modules in
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/?p=servicemix.git;a=commit;h=f6f10bf715621e056bdc691cfc705697b1907862)
>>
>>
>> On 13.06.2014 13:51, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> I would give that a go, at least.  It looks like ActiveMQ 5.10.0 was
>>> built with Camel 2.13.1, but the features files are pointing to a
>>> version range of [2.12,3) for Camel, so it should work fine.  For
>>> something like Camel, where people are actually using the API/classes
>>> themselves, upgrading to a new minor version in a bugfix release would
>>> not work, but for ActiveMQ, people are mostly using this as a service
>>> provided by the platform so that should be a bit less of a concern.
>>> So yeah, I would do the ActiveMQ upgrade for 5.0.x as well.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Gert
>>>>
>>>> Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only
>>>> change
>>>> should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>> On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>> L.S.,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things
>>>>> do look a lot better there.  How about we just commit those to the
>>>>> servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to
>>>>> test
>>>>> and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new
>>>>> 5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ
>>>>> upgrade
>>>>> to 5.10.0 on Monday?  Similarly, I think I would do the same changes
>>>>> on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well.
>>>>> Wdyt?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>> Yes :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>>>>>>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Raúl.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>>>>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>>>>>>> containing following changes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced
>>>>>>>> with 2.3.5)
>>>>>>>>   * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>>>>>>   * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>>>>>>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find
>>>>>>>> eventual
>>>>>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>              Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>>>>>>                  Key: SM-2328
>>>>>>>>>                  URL:
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>>>>>>              Project: ServiceMix
>>>>>>>>>           Issue Type: Task
>>>>>>>>>           Components: assemblies
>>>>>>>>>             Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>>>>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>>>>>>>
>>
>


--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: goo.gl/yvsebC
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [jira] [Created] (SM-2328) Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
In reply to this post by ksobkowiak
I created the 5.0.3 version in Jira.

Yes, indeed we have to reopen the issue addressed by Karaf 2.3.5 update.

Regards
JB

On 06/13/2014 10:18 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:

> Could you create a version 5.0.3 in Jira? I think, we have to reopen
> some issues which have been solved by upgrade to Karaf 2.3.5 and will be
> no more fixed after downgrade to 2.3.4 (like the Envers problem). We can
> set the fix version to 5.1.1 and 5.0.3 which will be upgraded to Karaf
> 2.3.6 and the issues should be fixed again.
>
> On 13.06.2014 14:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Good point.
>>
>> To limit the change on a minor release, I would just downgrade to
>> Karaf 2.3.4 in SMX 5.0.x and keep ActiveMQ current version.
>> We will focus on the 5.10 upgrade in SMX 5.1.x.
>>
>> My $0.01.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 06/13/2014 02:53 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>>> One remark for upgrading 5.0.x. The activemq-camel in the new ActiveMQ
>>> version (since 5.9.1) is no more merged with activemq-osgi ueberbundle.
>>> Thus some additional changes in the ServiceMix ActiveMQ modules and
>>> features have to be performed (look at the changes in activemq and
>>> assembly modules in
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/?p=servicemix.git;a=commit;h=f6f10bf715621e056bdc691cfc705697b1907862)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13.06.2014 13:51, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>> I would give that a go, at least.  It looks like ActiveMQ 5.10.0 was
>>>> built with Camel 2.13.1, but the features files are pointing to a
>>>> version range of [2.12,3) for Camel, so it should work fine.  For
>>>> something like Camel, where people are actually using the API/classes
>>>> themselves, upgrading to a new minor version in a bugfix release would
>>>> not work, but for ActiveMQ, people are mostly using this as a service
>>>> provided by the platform so that should be a bit less of a concern.
>>>> So yeah, I would do the ActiveMQ upgrade for 5.0.x as well.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Gert
>>>>>
>>>>> Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0 too? Or the only
>>>>> change
>>>>> should be downgrade to Karaf 2.3.4?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13.06.2014 13:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>>> L.S.,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been testing with the changes on Krzysztof's branch and things
>>>>>> do look a lot better there.  How about we just commit those to the
>>>>>> servicemix-5.1.x branch, that makes it a bit easier for people to
>>>>>> test
>>>>>> and play with them. If things look OK to everyone, we could do a new
>>>>>> 5.1.0 release with the older version of Karaf and the ActiveMQ
>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>> to 5.10.0 on Monday?  Similarly, I think I would do the same changes
>>>>>> on the servicemix-5.0.x branch and do a 5.0.2 release there as well.
>>>>>> Wdyt?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof
>>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13.06.2014 01:29, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>>>>>>>> 2.10.0? You mean 5.10.0, right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Raúl.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have pushed in my Github repo a new branch
>>>>>>>>> (https://github.com/sobkowiak/servicemix/tree/ActiveMQ-5.10.0)
>>>>>>>>> containing following changes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    * downgrade Karaf to 2.3.4 (to avoid the issue introduced
>>>>>>>>> with 2.3.5)
>>>>>>>>>    * upgraded ActiveMQ to 2.10.0
>>>>>>>>>    * remove the ActiveMQ web console workaround (SM-2303
>>>>>>>>>      <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2303>)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please feel free to checkout this branch and test. We can find
>>>>>>>>> eventual
>>>>>>>>> new issues introduced with 2.10.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12.06.2014 11:30, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Benjamin Graf created SM-2328:
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>               Summary: Upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.10.0
>>>>>>>>>>                   Key: SM-2328
>>>>>>>>>>                   URL:
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2328
>>>>>>>>>>               Project: ServiceMix
>>>>>>>>>>            Issue Type: Task
>>>>>>>>>>            Components: assemblies
>>>>>>>>>>              Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>>>>>>>> (v6.2#6252)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com